Amanuensis's Journal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Amanuensis

[ website | Despoiling Harry ]
[ userinfo | insanejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Discussion: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (Film) [Jul. 17th, 2009|10:44 am]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | satisfied]
[music |Pet shop boys, "Love, etc."]

Half-Blood Prince.

Short version: Hooray for the film doing a great job with a book I thought was badly flawed. It came much closer to selling me on its story, and I only felt the absence of perhaps one element from the book. I enjoyed it lots, and a good portion of it felt perfect.

Longer version behind the cut. Spoilers for the film. )
link12 comments|post comment

And I have all these Draco fans on my flist, too! [Jul. 15th, 2009|06:14 am]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | excited]
[music |hitomi no chikara]

NRG!

I haven't seen this particular picture or its accompanying discussion anywhere on my flist, and I would have thought it would have polarized folk! Had to wait until I turned the pages of a magazine, what's up with that?

An image from Half-Blood Prince in Entertainment Weekly featuring Draco. Spoilery for the film. )
link8 comments|post comment

July 31 already? WHERE IS MY SUMMER GOING. [Jul. 31st, 2008|06:21 pm]
[Tags|]
[mood | awake]
[music |dr horrible score]

Bad fan: Didn't make special post for Harry's birthday.

Good fan: Shelled out the pre-order cash for the special edition Tales of Beedle the Bard in a HEARTBEAT.

So, today, I balance out to "fan."
link2 comments|post comment

HBP trailer [Jul. 30th, 2008|10:54 am]
[Tags|]
[mood | busy]
[music |antique bakery]

Saw the trailer proper; yes, it looks pretty (Dumbledore's head not withstanding). I'm expecting to like the film; I see many opportunities for these final three films to repair the weaknesses in the final two books.

I would like to make a clever analogy that explains why HBP disappoints me, like, perhaps, "HBP is The Magician's Nephew of the series." Except it's not true. I liked The Magician's Nephew quite a bit, even if it introduces us to characters we don't know--or that we think we don't know, until later--because it's an active tale, not an expository one. It doesn't give me the sense of "You couldn't have explained this in two pages? You couldn't have explained this in two pages four books ago?" that HBP does. Pensieve exposition is still exposition.

The trailer really brings home how little--how little of importance, anyway--Harry has to do in this book.
link5 comments|post comment

[Apr. 21st, 2008|01:13 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | grrrr]
[music |spanish guitar. it's soothing]

God help me, I am trapped in Dilbert Hell. Something is wonky with my workplace's wireless internet, but in order for them to reboot their servers or routers or what have you, it has to go to higher administrative off-site echelons and be approved, which I'm told will take days to get the approval. If that even turns out to solve the problem. Meanwhile I am using dial-up. DIAL-UP. At least I made sure they never got rid of those analog phone access points.

But, I promised frivolity, didn't I? So here's a picture which made me snort caffeine-free diet coke up my nose.

(The Essential Ingredient, featuring Snape and a hippo, by Protowilson)

This is hardly strong evidence of how desperately work-related my need to have the high-speed wireless restablished is, but, foo. I'm taking my stress relievers where I can.
link8 comments|post comment

"Your mother was Severus Snape and your father's wand smelt of elderberries!" Or something. [Mar. 5th, 2008|10:59 am]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | curious]
[music |Rimsky-Korsakov, Scheherezade]

I said that the line about Draco Malfoy having been the Elder Wand's master was the "aha" moment for me; in looking through the text a little more (I told you I was tired) I'm recalling it was an "aha" moment--I'd forgotten, as we're supposed to, about Draco disarming Dumbledore--but the "aha" moment which preceded that was when Voldemort made his explanation to Snape. Voldemort says, "The Elder Wand belongs to the wizard who killed its last owner," and I took that to be the revelation that the wand transfers its power to that wizard's wand. Later the text says of Voldemort:
"It was time to leave this shack and take charge, with a wand that would now do his full bidding."
I never thought that meant anything other than that Voldemort took Snape's wand, thinking Snape's wand was now the Elder Wand. And, yes, that that meant the wand Voldemort was using from that point on was Snape's wand. Since I was wrong in that, do we know what happened to Snape's wand?

I still like the idea that Draco Malfoy was wandering around with this powerful wand all that time and didn't know it, because he's, y'know, Draco Malfoy. And that Harry took the wand from him and therefore took possession of the Elder Wand but didn't know what he had for a while either--that's what I had got from the line "who had come to take full possession of it at last"--acknowledgement, true acceptance of what he held. It feels more satisfying than the idea that the Elder Wand's sitting in Voldemort's hand but realizes that somewhere far off Harry has simply nicked a non-significant wand out of Draco's grasp and that makes the Elder Wand shift allegiance. Not quite sure I'm buying it yet, though technically I can see how it works.

It does make more sense now that I'm told "elder" can be a kind of wood, which is a better argument that the wand is fixed. I assumed "Elder" as a title, in the sense of "elder brother"--first-come, first-ruling, oldest and most senior. The first time we hear the word is within The Tale of the Three Brothers: "So Death crossed to an elder tree on the banks of the river..." From the high-toned prose of the story I assumed that was poetic-speak for "ancient tree." But elder is short, it seems, for elderberry?
link4 comments|post comment

Follow-up to the previous Elder Wand question. [Mar. 4th, 2008|10:15 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[music |law & order SVU omigod it got late]

Fascinating. When I read the words, "The master of the Elder Wand was Draco Malfoy," in DH, everything became plain as day to me: how the Elder Wand is not a fixed wand, but transfers its abilities to the wand which wins the duel. Which is why Voldemort's attempt to take the wand from Dumbledore's corpse was useless, because Dumbledore's wand was no longer the Elder Wand--the power had transferred to Draco's wand, and since Harry defeated Draco without a wand (Harry's was broken at the time, and he just physically overpowered and took the wand from Draco) the power of the Elder Wand simply stayed in that wand, and then acknowledged Harry as its master. I thought it was clever and satisfying.

Except it wasn't right. It works--it's a potential interpretation of the events, except for one bit in the text that counters it: the text identifies the wand that flies into the air in the very last Voldemort-Harry duel as "the Elder Wand" and from context that wand is the one which was in Voldemort's hand. If not for that it could have been valid, I think. Evidently JKR's interpretation of "The master of the Elder Wand was Draco Malfoy" was that Draco was the wand's master but he never actually took possession of it, and when Harry defeated Draco Harry became the wand's master but he didn't lay hands on it either until that final moment in the duel with Voldemort.

*yawns* I'm too tired to think of anything else except that I like my first version better.
link6 comments|post comment

I thought the Elder Wand business was one of the few things that did work out neatly, myself. [Mar. 4th, 2008|07:18 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | puzzled]
[music |Incognito Cinema Warriors]

Since DH I have seen a number of fanfiction stories that deal with Harry returning Draco's wand to him, as if it were just a kindness or a gesture, which has left me puzzled and wondering if these writers have missed something in DH. Draco's wand is the Elder Wand, which Harry says he will put away and not use, anticipating that if he dies a natural death the wand's power will be broken. Harry can't return Draco's wand to him without addressing that that wand is the Elder Wand. Am I the one who's confused?
link15 comments|post comment

Structure problems and positives in Deathly Hallows (take just the bolded bits if it's tl;dr) [Feb. 7th, 2008|10:16 am]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | summarizing]

woman_ironing, on the lj comm hp_essays, invites readers to discuss their disappointments on Deathly Hallows (in hopes that it may salvage dismissal of the entire series, and lead to a second look at DH), and I seem to be on a roll after my epilogue post. I've posted my summary points on DH disappointments (and positives) here and here on her post, but I'm also going to repost it below if anyone would like to engage in discussion here.

Structure problems and positives in Deathly Hallows


1. We've been set up for Snape to play a significant role, but instead get vast exposition on an already-dead character.

My disappointment with DH began with the previous book; HBP displayed from the second chapter that Snape was loyal to the Order and playing a dangerous double agent game, and would soon be required to do a terrible thing to keep his cover or be killed himself. I was dumbfounded when this was treated like some great surprise at the end of the book; while it deserved to be one climactic moment of the book, the true climax should have been the revelation to Harry that Snape and Dumbledore had planned the deception together. If the reader was told this at the beginning of the book, Harry should also have been told it by the end of the book. Leaving Harry in ignorance is poor narrative structure; the tale cannot be left to dangle like that, incomplete, at the end of a book.

Given that this plotline turned out to be the most significant part of HBP, whetting our appetites with Snape going into deep cover, DH should have followed through. In HBP Snape went from "side character who's loathsome but interesting" to "the other hero of the story." Snape should have played a significant role in the structure of DH, but instead he all but disappeared until a few pages before his death. While there are moments where his influence is there--Gryffindor's sword in the pond--they are invisible until after Snape has died. Only then is his story told, in one massive chapter of exposition.

What do we get instead of Snape's presence? We get, to my disappointment, considerable exposition regarding the life of Dumbledore--Dumbledore, who is dead. Again, poor narrative structure. The controversy surrounding Dumbledore is unfolded for us after he is dead. Snape's backstory is only told after he is dead. We no longer have any stake in what this means to the future actions of these characters, to their interactions with our protagonist. How different this knowledge would have resounded with us had these characters still been alive when we learned this! How we would have imagined Harry confronting Dumbledore, how much hope we would have had for Snape's survival (and how much more devastating his death), had we only known these things first. They would have been active portions of the story structure instead of past-tense exposition.

2. A change from the expected story structure established through six books--and not a well-executed change, either.

DH also disappoints by abandoning the school year structure that books one through six follow. Because of this DH feels like a book from a different series. We are used to the Harry Potter series being a tale of student interactions, knowledge gained through classes and textbooks, and contrivances by our heroes that are used to get around the restrictions of school rules and the school year itself. The last book abandons that, and that violation of reader expectations should not be forgiven lightly. DH could be considered an alternate reality story of the Harry Potter series, where the characters are placed into a high-fantasy quest story. One can argue whether it is a good quest story or not; I do not feel it is that good of one, myself, what with the time wasted doing nothing in the forest, the "madcap hijinks" feel of the trio's escapades (too silly right when the books should be at their darkest and most serious), and the flimsy contrivance to set the final battle at Hogwarts. These leech a great deal of dignity from the book, even the moments that are meant to be somber, such as Dobby's death. But whether it is a good quest story or not, it is a deviation from the structure that the reader has been asked to expect and now does expect.

3. Lack of emotional engagement in Harry's romantic destiny.

Both HBP and DH disappointed me in the romantic plotline regarding Harry and Ginny by failing to show their connection and/or affection for each other; instead we were told Harry was struck by sudden jealous lust for her, and this is all we have to support the concept of these two having a lifelong love. They may be right for each other conceptually, but there's nothing to make the reader feel it.

A positive! How Harry has been set up both to die and to live.

Despite all these negatives, one element within DH--arguably the most important and central element--shines through as well-planned and well-executed. At the end of book four, GoF, we are given a hint of something significant in Dumbledore's "gleam of something like triumph" when he is told Voldemort used Harry's blood for the ritual. We don't know why. We're left to think about it all through books five and six. And when we get the payoff, it's big. Harry learns he holds a fragment of Voldemort's soul (hinted at when we first learn of Horcruxes), and must die for Voldemort to die. But he does not know until after his death that his blood in Voldemort's flesh maintains enough of a link to return Harry to life if he chooses. It's wonderful--the theme of the entire series is that some things are worse than death and many things are worth death and death should not be feared if it must be faced. Harry has been groomed by Dumbledore to go to his death willing and unflinching, and go he does. The theme of the books required that he do this at the end. Yet he is saved from death not by a cheap cheat in my opinion, but by an element that has been established from the first book and hinted at, in a clever yet still obscure manner, in the fourth. Harry both dies and lives within this tale, and while it might have been gutsy to leave him dead there's a narrative justice that he goes willingly to his death but is allowed a happy ending.
link29 comments|post comment

On the infamous epilogue [Jan. 29th, 2008|08:07 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | hungry]
[music |David Bowie, "Golden Years"]

The epilogue to Deathly Hallows is the sort of thing I should like. Seriously, in a good long story I love hearing who married whom and how many children they had and what their names were and what their lives were like. I eat that up with a spoon. On that level, yes, I do like the epilogue. I do not think it reads like bad fanfic, as some have criticised--I did not expect revelations to 2001: A Space Odyssey depths, I did not expect The Sixth Sense-level twists, in terms of their post-Voldemort lives. Ordinary, day-to-day, kid-raising lives. How deserving that Harry should have obtained something so plain and wonderful for himself. And we have concrete evidence that Harry grew to understand and forgive and even &hearts Severus Snape. So, yes, in principle, I do like the epilogue.

The epilogue does jar me in two significant ways, and in one I have a reader's eyes, and in the other I have a fanfiction writer's.

1. Harry/Ginny is dreadful.

2. Bitch chewed up nineteen years of my fanon.

Does any of that need much explanation? The romance of Harry and Ginny sucks. Harry feels nothing whatsoever for Ginny for five books--any moments of interaction they have are devoid of any emotional engagement on Harry's part--and then we are, violation of all storytelling violations, told that Harry suddenly feels passionately for Ginny. I don't give a shit if that's how romance happens in real life. Storytelling doesn't have shit to do with "how it happens in real life." Storytelling is about engaging the reader as the narrative is spun. Storytelling is about making it happen and making the reader feel as the protagonist feels without trying to tell the reader how to feel. Harry/Ginny does none of these. Harry/Ginny is shitty romance, and the epilogue throws that in my face yet again. (Wow, that's three uncensored "shit"s in one paragraph. Don't hold back, Amy, tell us how you really feel.)

And it's the fanfiction theorist--I include fanartists in that, because their work creates fanfiction in graphic form--who gets upset over the shutting-off of nineteen years of open canon. The "whatever you want to imagine it to be from this point on," cut short. Nineteen years. That entire stretch of narrative boxed in by that epilogue. Restricted. Caged! How dare she! Attica! Attica! Azkaban! Azkaban!

I mean, I would like to whine that the epilogue is all so unabashedly heterosexual, isn't it, but that's just an extension of "Give me back those nineteen years so that I can correct that crappy romance and add all the other stuff I like to imagine instead." Can't fight that scene. Can write around it if you want--can get damn clever in writing around it--but it's canon. Epilogue What Epilogue has become its own dominant AU subspecies, and no wonder. Epilogue no fun. Epilogue go 'way.

So I think the fanfiction kind of fan is more likely to dislike the epilogue than the casual fan, for reason that it makes our sandbox tinier. Though I think both kinds can have the taste to hate the Harry/Ginny for just being blah.
link61 comments|post comment

And I will pet him and call him George (and get hexed for it, no doubt). [Nov. 25th, 2007|06:17 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | covetous]
[music |Disney soundtracks]

It will be mine.



Oh, yes, it will be mine.
link14 comments|post comment

Had it been a different character, would you have been happier? [Oct. 24th, 2007|02:20 pm]
[Tags|, , ]
[mood | tea and cookies!]
[music |something by Pachelbel which isn't the canon]

[info]themostepotente has a poll on her lj in which one of the questions asks, "If Rowling had chosen another male character [to be gay] in place of Dumbledore, who[m] do you wish it had been?"

I'm pretty happy with Dumbledore, myself. I mean, the most powerful wizard in centuries? The hero's mentor and most important father figure? (Yeah, I know, I still want Sirius to have been Harry's most important father figure, but that's me and my little world.) Deathly Hallows demonstrates that Rowling saw the books as being nearly as much about Dumbledore as about Harry (again I would have liked them to be more about Snape than Dumbledore but again that's another visit to Amy World), and for her to have crafted that particular character knowing that his sexuality leaned that way--well, yeah, I am pretty happy about that choice.

In fairness, sure, I'd pick Harry first. God, just imagine. Harry ends up kissing Draco Malfoy instead of Ginny Weasley. I'd have died of an ecstatic brain hemorrhage. Of course, that would have required a rewrite of the last two books--all to the good, because the Harry/Ginny romance remains gag-worthy (and not, repeat, NOT because it's het).

But I wouldn't pick Snape because I wouldn't want Snape to be "the gay one" all alone. It would suck for me, thinking, "Oh, great--Snape, the one who's sullen, dark, sneaky, grudge-holding, unfair, hated, picked on--let's get a few more negative stereotypes in here, shall we?" Shylockian, I would have called it. Whereas outing Dumbledore--Dumbledore, despite his not-so-pristine past and manipulative ways, comes off as fabulous. Stereotype, yes, but at least a positive one. Still stands on its own outside of that closet and happily kicks your ass if you protest. I mean, yes, I love Snape and imagine him as gayer than a treeful of monkeys but I want him to be outed with somebody, if that makes sense. In fact, by outing Dumbledore, it does call his intimacies with Snape into question. But by implying "Snape with Dumbledore," homosexuality would not be read as just one more dark aspect of Snape's character, done in this way.

Lupin, on the other hand, would have been fascinating. Imagine Rowling saying, "Lupin was not merely conflicted about his romance with Tonks because he thought he was too old and too poor." Imagine what that would have invited. Lupin got married despite having other leanings, became resigned to it after his son was born because it had brought at least one wonderful thing into his world. The idea rankles because it wears a little sheen of "reproduction good, so maybe gayness not so good" upon it--but it invites one to see bisexuality and homosexuality within the text even where there appears to be happy heteronormativity between couples. Loaded. Hugely loaded. But fascinating.

I feel about Sirius the same way I feel about Snape--don't let him be gay alone; put someone with him and I'd be happy. (Like Snape.) Yet it's not because of Sirius being thought of as a dark character, though--I wouldn't have liked the idea that he was conveniently killed off so that no one would have to resolve the idea of him being both gay and a parent/older brother/best buds figure to Harry. As if it were punishment. If he'd been paired with someone--Snape, Remus--then devoting that degree of depth in the story to two gay characters might have erased those "punishment" feelings. So it isn't just a good guys/bad guys thing here, in terms of whom to de-closet and what would avoid the negative stereotypes. Draco could have been gay and I wouldn't have winced. Lucius? Heck, Lucius would rival Dumbledore in fabulosity.

But I do like that it's a good guy, and a hugely significant character, and the most powerful wizard in ages. Yeah.
link21 comments|post comment

But let's get a better name for it than Dindlewald, shall we? [Oct. 20th, 2007|06:50 am]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | gleeful]
[music |She Wants Revenge, "These Things"]

Sometimes the internet is especially worth waking up to.

Bless her. I've been shipping Dumbledore/Grindlewald since I read DH. And now I'm wondering how many of us will still be so eager to say "Author interviews don't count," without adding, "...er, unless I want them to!" which has pretty much been my stance all along.

And this is one I wouldn't have expected to see revealed in the text, either, because it wouldn't have furthered the plot, it'd've stopped it cold. No place to put it. And that's saying something in a novel as scattered-structured as DH, whoof. Hard to admit that sort of revelation--a theme that ordinarily would have made me squee--would probably have had me yelling, "Shut up already about Dumbledore's effing history, woman! You've bored me to death with it already!"
link6 comments|post comment

Two more DRABBLES: Harry/Ginny, Star Wars Gen [Sep. 14th, 2007|01:15 pm]
[Tags|, , ]
[mood | sandalwood]
[music |Loreena McKennitt, "All Souls' Night"]

Two more drabbles arose from the "why is Nine/Jack/Nine funny to me" post (answer: 9-JACK-9, the electronic assassin from the comic Zot!); for some reason they both got a similar theme.

[info]dorothy1901 asked for Harry/Ginny, post-DH, remembering Snape.

Mum's Privilege, Harry/Ginny, ~130 words. As G as they come.

*****

'Gwenog's nice,' Harry said, trying to put just the right touch of hopefulness in it but sounding more desperate. 'How about Gwenog?' )

And [info]neotoma wanted some Star Wars Gen with the prompt "Luke's Worst Trait."

Even Jedi Start As Babies, Star Wars Gen, ~160 words, also fiercely G.

*****

At two days old, it's hard for either twin to have traits at all. )
link14 comments|post comment

DRABBLE: Most Singularly Repulsive Man (Neville/Filch, R, ~225 words) [Sep. 12th, 2007|10:22 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | still naughty]

And one more, for [info]atdelphi.

Most Singularly Repulsive Man, Neville/Filch, R, ~225 words

*****

'Mr. Filch,' said Neville, 'I want you to know that you're the most singularly repulsive man I've ever known. And I've had Voldemort within inches of me.' )
link14 comments|post comment

DRABBLE: Hide In Plain Sight (James/Scorpius, PG-13, ~250 words) [Sep. 12th, 2007|09:23 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | naughty]

Annnnnnd the drabble in question for [info]gossymer is here.

Hide In Plain Sight, ~250 words, James/Scorpius, PG-13 for suggestiveness.

*****

'Do you like your classes, Scorpius?' asked Mrs. Potter. )
link20 comments|post comment

SCREENPLAY: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: One Fan's Screenplay (PG-13, ~25,000 words) [Sep. 6th, 2007|09:35 am]
[Tags|, , , ]
[mood | is it fic or is it meta?]
[music |Women of the World: Celtic]

Title: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: One Fan's Screenplay
Author: [info]amanuensis1
Words: ~25,000
Rating: Nothing more objectionable than was in the text to begin with. Whaddya think, maybe PG-13?
A/N: (Unauthorized) Adaptation of HBP to screen, so, many lines deliberately lifted and/or altered from the original text. This is a screenplay (an amateur one), not a shooting script, so not all actions/camera angles/actor directions/etc. are detailed.
More detailed A/N at the conclusion.

(Read it at my website)
link23 comments|post comment

Amusingly, there are no actual spoilers in that link. [Sep. 3rd, 2007|11:54 am]
[Tags|]
[mood | still cracking up]
[music |films I only have on VHS! Prince of Foxes! The Egyptian!]

*gigglesnort* This "Overheard in New York" has to be the best reaction to "No Harry Potter Spoilers!" ever.

Meantime, I finished the...thing...Saturday night. Truly a frenzy; done six days from the moment I started, with 10K words done on Thursday and 10K words done on Saturday, with the others worked in and around work hours the other days. I have formatting and some after-notes and maybe a little editing to accomplish, and there's a work presentation that's due Thursday (it's inevitable; I always get the best spurts of creativity when there's a different project deadline looming) so I think I'm likely to put the thing up just after that. Watch for it Thursday. When I will stop calling it "thing." Don't want to give it a complex.
link9 comments|post comment

Deathly Hallows, second time through via audiobook [Aug. 29th, 2007|02:58 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | calm]
[music |Tori Amos, "Space Dog"]

Finished the audiobook of Deathly Hallows the other day.

Audiobook is not always the best way to experience a book. Some books aren't cut out for that kind of word-for-word read, some voice actors make you want to scream. And it's a lot lot lot slower than I can read, and I can't really pay attention to it unless I'm in a car. So I guess if they ever perfect teleportation, audiobooks and I will part ways. Anyway, I found the audiobook of DH much more enjoyable than my first read-through of it, but it's of course difficult to separate what of that was the audiobook experience versus the second go-through experience.

It's easier to see how that first four-hour read of DH was affected by my expectations. The first time through I was too wrapped up in the what will happen, too focused on what is happening to enjoy the actual prose--which is Rowling's real gift. Critics say of her works, "It's not genius lit, but it's a helluva good story," without ever defining--maybe they don't know?--what they mean by that. I hear people praise her characters, her storytelling--what is all that? Characters and story are still just words on a page, kidlets. Rowling does words on a page very, very well. Here, this is the sentence that follows the moment Voldemort is really and truly dead:

"One shivering second of silence, the shock of the moment suspended..." --you guys missed all that lovely alliteration the first time through, didn't you? I certainly did. That's freakin' gorgeous. Those words actually hold their breath in all those hissed little esses.

You can't notice mere prose when you're focused on who's gonna die and will I get to see enough of the characters I like. Similar to my first experience of the film of The Fellowship of the Ring, all I could do was watch to see how it was executed, and only after it was done could I say, "Oh! Let's do that again, so I can actually try to enjoy it this time!"

So, somewhere combined in the second go-through and the slow narrative experience of the audiobook, there's a more interesting book in there for me. The pacing did not jar nearly so greatly as it had the first time; the Great Camping Trip did not have me screaming to get on with it. Plot twists were better explained, better wrapped-up. (All those "When was that? I don't even remember that," conversations I had just post-book received their "Ohhh, THAT" counterparts at last.) Goofy bits (the ministry mission to get the locket, Harry's facial disfiguration when they're caught by Greyback, Hermione's impersonation of Bellatrix and the raid on Gringotts) still felt goofy but not quite so humiliating. The rush of pensieve scenes concerning Snape did not feel nearly so much like an info dump. Plus, I cried this time through, multiple places. The first was Dudley's plaintive, "But where's he going to go?" I cried for Kreacher not being able to tell anyone that Regulus was not merely missing but dead because he'd been commanded not to (plus I'm no longer as upset over The Reformation of Kreacher because he doesn't, really--Harry is tolerant now that Kreacher isn't hostile to him any longer and is trying to make up for his past behavior, but he's still never fond of the little shit)--I think I was even crying for Mrs. Black, a little, during that, the idea of her awful bewilderment over where Regulus might have got to. I choked up during Snape's memories at the line, "...something was making a terrible sound, like a wounded animal." And I actually had to turn the CD player off for a bit and sob, mascara running down my face and not caring what other drivers thought of me, when Harry, knowing he has to go to his own death, hears the injured girl in Hogwarts crying to go home, and thinks, "He wanted to be stopped, to be dragged back, to be sent back home." God, that hit me like bricks--how many times have I been in a dreadful, dreadful situation and been reduced to a child's whimper of, "I want to go home," as if the concept of going home would make everything not so?

And there's a thing an audiobook does--it removes the tricks that your eyes play when you read. When I read, I take in a paragraph at once with my eyes; I can't ignore the other words in the paragraph. The sentence directly before that one about Harry wanting to be sent back home is, "He wanted to shout out to the night, he wanted Ginny to know that he was there..." And there's no way that I can see that entire paragraph and not see the word Ginny in there, leaving me groaning, Oh, gag me, no more about Ginny, please. One word can poison the whole paragraph for me, and the power of the rest of the prose is lost. Not so with an audiobook, where the words are not visible, where they're gone as soon as they're said aloud, where you are sense-deprived of what your sight could have done to you. I could never have wept over those words while reading the text visually because of that "see the whole paragraph" handicap.

Some dissatisfactions remain. The concept of the Deathly Hallows still feels minor, coming as late as it does in the book and feeling more like a sidebar rather than something that earn's the book's title. Ariana Dumbledore is a terrible bit of late-insertion who-cares backstory. The delay in going to Godric's Hollow reeks of retconning, given what Harry says at the end of HBP. I also would have liked to have had more of a denouement rather than having an epilogue try to substitute for the lack of one. And Harry/Ginny is still the dullest romance ever.

As a four-hour read, Deathly Hallows invited a lot of "Wha?" from me. As a 21-hour audio experience, it's better. (Which, significantly, wasn't my experience after doing the same first-read-then-listen thing with Half-Blood Prince. I was still pissed at it for ending when it did.)
link24 comments|post comment

DRABBLE/FICLET: Awkward Questions (Draco-centric, G, ~300 words) [Aug. 25th, 2007|07:03 am]
[Tags|, ]
[mood | tum te tum]

Draco-centric subtextual maxi-drabble written for [info]femmequixotic, posted over at [info]bandinnabox.

Title: Awkward Questions
Author: Amanuensis
Pairings: Subtextual HP-verse.
Rating: G
About 300 words

*****
('Dad'?)
link8 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]